Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

'Review of District of Columbia's Accounts Receivable System for Medicaid Provider Overpayments,'

Issued on  | Posted on  | Report number: A-03-03-00222

Report Materials

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This review was part of a multistate audit. Our objective was to determine whether the District of Columbia (District) reported Medicaid provider overpayments in accordance with Federal requirements.  The District did not report all overpayments in accordance with Federal requirements during our October 1, 2001, through September 30, 2002, audit period.  Specifically, the District did not report overpayments totaling $3,999,211 ($2,195,049 Federal share) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) because the overpayments had not been collected due to appeals from the providers and  did not report overpayments totaling $16,172,361 ($9,168,584 Federal share) within the required timeframe because the District reimbursed CMS only after collecting overpayments from providers. 

We recommended that the District:  (1) include unreported overpayments totaling $3,999,211 on the Quarterly Medicaid Statement of Expenditures for the Medical Assistance Program, Form CMS-64 (CMS-64), and refund the $2,195,049 Federal share; (2) determine the value of overpayments identified after our audit period that have not been reported and include them on the CMS-64; (3) establish a policy consistent with Federal reporting requirements that accurately reports overpayments on the CMS-64; and (4) ensure that all future overpayments are reported within 60 days in accordance with Federal regulations.  In response to our draft report, the District concurred with the results of our audit and said that it was in the process of reporting the identified overpayments.  The District did not address our recommendation to determine the value of overpayments identified after our audit period that have not been reported.


-
-
-