Report Materials
WHY WE DID THIS REVIEW
For a covered outpatient drug to be eligible for Federal reimbursement under the Medicaid program's drug rebate requirements, manufacturers must pay rebates to the States for the drugs. However, a prior OIG review found that States did not always invoice and collect all rebates due for drugs administered by physicians.
Our objective was to determine whether New Jersey complied with Federal Medicaid requirements for invoicing manufacturers for rebates for physician-administered drugs.
HOW WE DID THIS REVIEW
Our review covered fee-for-service claims for physician-administered drugs paid between January 2014 and December 2016. We used the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS's) Medicare Part B crosswalk and the CMS Medicaid Drug File to identify single-source and multiple-source drugs. Additionally, we determined whether the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes were published in CMS's top-20 multiple-source drug listing.
WHAT OIG FOUND
New Jersey did not always comply with Federal Medicaid requirements for invoicing manufacturers for rebates for physician-administered drugs. Specifically, New Jersey did not invoice manufacturers for rebates associated with $8.1 million (Federal share) in single-source and top-20 multiple-source physician-administered drugs. Because New Jersey's internal controls did not always ensure that it invoiced manufacturers to secure rebates, New Jersey improperly claimed Federal reimbursement for these single-source drugs and top-20 multiple-source drugs.
Further, New Jersey did not submit the drug utilization data necessary to secure rebates for other physician-administered drugs. These drugs were included in claims totaling $7,889 (Federal share) that did not have drug codes and in claims totaling $1.1 million (Federal share) that contained drug codes.
WHAT OIG RECOMMENDS AND NEW JERSEY'S COMMENTS
We recommend that New Jersey refund to the Federal Government $8.1 million for single-source and top-20 multiple-source physician-administered drugs and work with CMS to determine the unallowable portion of the $1.1 million for other drug claims in question. We also made procedural recommendations.
In written comments on our draft report, the State agency partially concurred with our first two recommendations, concurred with our other four recommendations, and described corrective actions it planned to take.
Notice
This report may be subject to section 5274 of the National Defense Authorization Act Fiscal Year 2023, 117 Pub. L. 263.